The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is beginning to clarify an employer’s burden in workplace religious accommodation cases after the Supreme Court of the United States’ Groff v.

This Federal Circuit opinion analyzes the presumption of obviousness and the obviousness challenge based on prior art that describes a wider range of doses than what is claimed.

In Space Exploration Technology Corp. v. NLRB, No. 24-50627 (5th Cir. 2025) (“SpaceX”), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...

The New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal, affirming an Administrative Law Judge, held that the Internet Tax Freedom Act ...

The purchase of a solar energy panel system (the “System”) by a residential homeowner is typically structured as follows: ...

On August 13, 2025, New York Attorney General Letitia James (“NY AG”) announced the filing of a lawsuit against Early Warning ...

On Aug. 19, 2025, the Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service issued Notice 2025-45, announcing their ...

The Massachusetts Attorney General issued new regulations labeled “Unfair and Deceptive Fees” that take effect on Sept. 2, ...

Child labor laws have changed in several states this year with some states tightening restrictions on child labor and other ...

Blackie’s warrants are named after the 1981 case Blackie’s House of Beef v. Castillo, where the D.C. Circuit held that the ...

In this inaugural episode of our EEOC Exclusive podcast series, Adam Dougherty (shareholder, Dallas) sits down with Jim Paul ...

Earlier this year, as deadlines for online platforms passed to implement highly effective age verification and to conduct ...